Sanusi Lamido
Sanusi who was until Thursday, last week, Governor of Nigeria’s Central
Bank finally had to vacate his exalted office before the end of his five-year
term? Are there Nigerians confused that his exit had such direct presidential
link, as there was no ambiguity to the statement announcing his removal by
presidential spokesman, Reuben Abati?
There
was no pretence that his ouster came directly from the President who just
couldn’t wait to see the back of the Kano prince before his projected exit in
June. The presidential order announcing his removal had no slight hint of the
usual courtesy, gratitude and good wishes often extended to public officers,
even those apparently sacked, for their services to the country.
Abati’s
statement was brief, brusque and full of accusation. In the eyes of President
Jonathan, Sanusi not only went beyond his brief as CBN Governor but also abused
his office. He was disrespectful of his employers, violated laid down
procedures and the oath he swore to on his appointment. With such
strongly-worded statement from the Presidency in a country where it is routine
to provide very soft landing even for confirmed public thieves, Sanusi ought to
be made more answerable for his term in office.
But
did Sanusi really abuse his position in the manner given out by Abati? And if
so,
would he be prosecuted? What would be the outcome of such prosecution? Or
is there more to Sanusi’s removal than Nigerians have been told?
Certainly,
there is more to Sanusi’s removal and many Nigerians would say so. His sack is
most unusual. It is a record in its own right. Although for a public officer of
his rank, Sanusi can neither be hired nor fired without presidential assent.
But
there was too much of presidential angst in Abati’s announcement to go
unnoticed. The President must have personally felt affronted by this particular
officer, an appointee of his predecessor, that his spokesman had to be clear
that Jonathan personally wanted him out.
This,
I say, shouldn’t come as a surprise to Nigerians. That the announcement came
when the former CBN Governor was abroad on official assignment also couldn’t
have been by chance. It was a coup against him, a way to rub it in that he occupied
his office at the pleasure of somebody, a boss who could send him home like an
erring school boy.
Relations
between Sanusi’s CBN and the Presidency have gone sour in recent times. If one
must put it starkly, it was a psychological battle or it’s been made to look
like there was one between President Jonathan and Lamido Sanusi.
There
couldn’t have been any love lost between the two since the contents of a letter
Sanusi wrote to Jonathan last September found its way to the public, particular
the public letter written to Jonathan by his estranged mentor, former President
Obasanjo. Sanusi had in that letter alleged that about N50 billion of oil
revenue due to Nigeria had not been paid into the Federation Account by the
Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation.
Until
Obasanjo alluded to this episode in his letter, there was no hint of any kind
that Jonathan paid any attention to Sanusi’s allegation against the NNPC. But
it was a sore point in the letter Jonathan was forced to write in his response
to Obasanjo. It would become a major point of public discourse and has remained
so since December 2, 2013 when Obasanjo released his bombshell of a letter to
Jonathan.
Rather
than the issue thrown up by the trio’s letters dying down, it has proven a
major weapon and talking point in the arsenal of opposition parties in the
run-up to the next presidential elections. The crises in the PDP in which there
have been scores of defections have been made worse by spin-offs from the
initial allegation by Sanusi.
Sanusi’s
whistle-blowing has exposed Nigerians to the rot being perpetrated by players
in the downstream sector of the Nigerian oil industry, especially the NNPC in
collusion with the Finance Ministry which has tried to control the damage
caused by Sanusi’s exposure. Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala has tried to ‘reconcile’ the
NNPC account with that of the CBN by telling us all that only N10 billion could
not be accounted for by the NNPC.
It
was an unconvincing argument that has since attracted the attention of the
National Assembly and is now the subject of parliamentary probe. The Jonathan
administration, indeed President Jonathan himself, has not been looking too
clean in these series of investigations.
Both
Okonjo-Iweala and her Petroleum Ministry counterpart, Diezeani Allison-Madueke
who many Nigerians would not be unhappy to see go, have been summoned severally
to the National Assembly to state their sides of what they know of the
so-called missing N50 billion.
The
investigations have dovetailed into investigation of how presidential orders
have been violated by the NNPC and so-called subsidy has been paid on kerosene
even when Nigerians have not enjoyed a kobo of it. Indeed, Allison-Madueke made
the outstanding claim that the presidential order to stop ‘subsidy’ on kerosene
was not a law that the NNPC was bound by and so was summarily ignored. Yet, no
Nigerian buying kerosene has benefitted from the subsidy money her ministry was
happy paying middlemen and other touts of the Nigerian oil sector.
Sanusi
has not kept quiet in all this. He has continued to provide information on the
scams going on in the oil industry and neither Okonjo-Iweala nor
Allison-Madueke could claim they still see Sanusi as their friend anymore.
Together they had tried to sell Nigerians on the baloney that buying fuel,
which has again been scarce in the last two weeks, at high prices is the only
way out for Nigerians to put an end to the corruption in the oil sector.
Iweala
had in fact contradicted Sanusi at one of their recent outings at the National
Assembly. Sanusi’s disclosures have looked like a battle between him and
Jonathan represented by his fronts in the NNPC corruption saga, namely,
Diezeani Allison-Madueke and Okonjo-Iweala. These are ministers seen as very
close to the President, people he wouldn’t and, perhaps, couldn’t sack from
office.
In
exposing the rot going on under the watch of these ministers, Sanusi would seem
to be fighting President Jonathan.
The
muscle-flexing between him, his former friends and the President would take a
foolish turn weeks ago when it was said that a telephone conversation between
the President who had asked for Sanusi’s resignation and Sanusi degenerated
into a shouting match. Sanusi, Nigerians were told, had rebuffed the President.
This
all makes Abati’s announcement of Sanusi’s removal while away on an ECOWAS
meeting in Niger look like Jonathan asserting his power. But is he right?
No comments:
Post a Comment